Overview - Wind Energy Solutions
Blade Pitch Control
Comparison of Electric and Hydraulic Blade Pitch Control
| Hydraulic | Electric | |
|---|---|---|
| Design / composition | Consists of a Hydraulic Power Unit (HPU) in the nacelle and three actuators with control valves and accumulators in the hub | Includes three sets of motors/gears, drives, controllers, and energy storage units. Consists of from 3 to 8 switchgear cabinets depending on what functions are assembled in one cabinet. |
| Strengths | High forces, no need for gears No backlash Fail-safe powered by accumulator |
Low energy consumption Quiet operation (no pump) |
| Weaknesses | Management of hydraulic fluid, possible oil leakage High energy consumption as pump runs continuously Repetitive maintenance as filtration and oil replacement. Fluid Rotary Union required. Accumulator pressure loss |
Maintenance of batteries Backlash Increased probability of failure due to higher number of components (energy storage unit, motor/gear, controller) |
| Cost | Initial cost lower; running cost higher due to higher maintenance cost | Initial cost higher; running cost lower due to lower maintenance cost |
| Maintenance | Cylinder seals need to be replaced every 7 to 10 years | Largely maintenance-free except battery change |
| Working Environment | Noisy due to pump Risk of oil leakage |
Little room for movement in hub |
| Image | Highly reliable due to proven fail-safe functionality | Environmentally friendly system |
